28 Sep
2006
28 Sep
'06
12:03 p.m.
Hi,
I'm checking for a Re-Invite (Hold)
The Invite from the UA is like this:
SIP MESSAGE 1 10.46.11.132:5060() -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060()
UDP Frame 1 28/Sep/06 10:45:38.0422
TimeFromPreviousSipFrame=0.0000 TimeFromStart=0.0000
INVITE sip:67512388@10.46.11.101:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.46.11.132;branch=z9hG4bKeb3ee7f3572b7f4b
Route:<sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;lr=on;ftag=9f2aeb7dd809d46d;nat=yes;did=3c4.85d80b74>
Route:<sip:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy;lr=on;ftag=9f2aeb7dd809d46d;nat=yes>
I do a check_route_param("nat=yes")
Should not this work?
from the doc it says check_route_param:
The function checks if the URI parameters of the local Route header
(coresponding to the local server)
I'm also calling the function after loose_route()
br hw
tor, 28,.09.2006 kl. 11.35 +0300, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:
Hi Helge,
doesn't matter how you added the RR hdr - via record_route(),
record_route_preset() or append_hf(). When you receive a sequential
request, check_route_param("") will check the params of the
corresponding Route hdr.
Maybe it is a reg exp problem or the Route does not contain the param
you are looking for...
regards,
bogdan
Helge Waastad wrote:
--
Helge Waastad
Senior Engineer
Systemavdelingen
Smartnet
Hi,
I was just wondering if the check_route_param("") works on
record_route_preset Routes?
It never hits when my Route: are, f.ex like
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:<port>;nat=yes
Is this true?
br hw