Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Martes, 17 de Marzo de 2009, Guillaume Lacroix escribió:
Thanks for the quick answer and explanation Iñaki :) As you advised, I opened a feature request in the tracker and put in it the elements you mentionned. If anyone has yet a way to trick openSER to not forward 487 answer with no transaction attached, I would be glad to know it :)
Thanks, hope we could find a solution for that.
Can't you check if a transaction exists and "drop" the reply in the reply route?
If reply-routes can be used to modify replies (i.e. SDP and Contact fixups for NAT traversal), surely they can be used to suppress them as well?