3 Mar
2016
3 Mar
'16
11:20 a.m.
As not for the module, but there is b2bua FOSS in the market, Like
https://github.com/sippy/b2bua
Also, as a person, that worked with OpenSIP’s b2bua module, can say it’s
really strange and limited in functionality.
So, +1 for b2bua module with good design. (Like proxy|relay registrations,
invites, but with top hiding and rtpproxy support)
2016-03-03 11:00 GMT+02:00 Federico Cabiddu <federico.cabiddu(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
I'm not a fan of the idea of having a B2B implemented in Kamailio, but at
the same time I agree with Alex's reasons for having it, so I give a +1 to
this.
Cheers,
Federico
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Fred Posner <fred(a)palner.com> wrote:
--
Best regards,
Igor
On 03/02/2016 12:45 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi,
I wanted to raise the possibility of an inline signalling-only B2BUA
component to Kamailio.
+1 for this... for many reasons including seeing what happens when the
following threshold is met:
I myself am philosophically opposed to a B2BUA in
Kamailio
to the threshold of physical violence.
-- Alex
Fred Posner
The Palner Group, Inc.
http://www.palner.com (web)
+1-224-334-FRED (3733) direct
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users