Hi All,I've been going through my script against other examples on the internet and cannot see any differences, also changing use_received between 1 and 0 makes no different.Kamailio still uses the Contact header instead of the Route header.If any one has any suggestions it would be very much appreciated, but I'll continue going through the config line by line.Kind regards,Luke_______________________________________________On 1 August 2016 at 13:46, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne@gmail.com> wrote:Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Daniel,Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfgmodparam("path", "use_received", 1)Kind regards,LukeOn 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received parameter?Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918 address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
------
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users