10 Jun
2005
10 Jun
'05
8:16 p.m.
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's
already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some
information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see
avpops module)
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards,
Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and
failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to
execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used
for executing the main route script? If it was possible, I would not
need to share state information between different SER processes
Thank you in advance,
Dmitry
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro