18 Jan
2005
18 Jan
'05
10:59 a.m.
Hi,
The reason why I need both is:
1) I want to use SER as the only point where to implement all call routing
logic
2) I need a gateway that supports ISDN NT-mode
Because of 2 I am using Asterisk, do you know something better ?
Regards,
Alex
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 02:03, Matt Schulte wrote:
Yes this is a big no no, forgive my ignorance I
understand using SER as
a proxy but if you are dealing with one server why run both SER and Ast?
It's most likely confused because of the callid being the same. If you
*really* wanted to you could media proxy via SER and potentially
generate a second callid.. I tried doing this myself in a similar
situation and realized it's more a pain than it's worth..
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Hoffmann [mailto:alexander.hoffmann@netgenius.de]
On Friday 14 January 2005 12:53, Klaus Darilion wrote:
What does hairpin in asterisk terminology mean?
Thus it is absolutely ok if there is an INV
from ISDN card1 -> going to SER -> returning to * -> terminated at ISDN
card2.
You can easily configure * to route calls like this, but it will
complain
about loops. If you comment out the loop detection in the source code
(because this is not a loop here) then Asterisk will run into a
deadlock. I googled for a solution and saw people discussing similar
issues and talking
about hairpins. IMHO: What ever you call this, it stays a bug in
ASTERISK.
If you have any suggestions what to do, please let me know !
Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers