29 Mar
2005
29 Mar
'05
9:54 p.m.
Jan Janak wrote:
On 23-02 08:00, Jev wrote:
Hi Jan,
I only got around to testing this today!
You are right, it does work. But the serctl shell script checks for
overlapping aliases in the function check_alias() on line 247
(rel_0_9_0), which prevents me from adding many targets to a single alias.
Removing that block allows me to add one to many aliases.
Would it be reasonable to remove that block? See attached patch for your
convenience.
All the best,
-Jev
Hi All,
For the 0_9_0 branch, what is the 'best practice' for implementing
parallel forking?
We used to be able to point one alias at several accounts, but that
feature has regressed.
It is still possible in 0.9.0, just make sure that you have a single
alias pointing to several destinations. lookup would automatically add
all of them to the destination set and t_relay would fork the request.
Jan.
--- scripts/sc Tue Mar 29 10:49:31 2005
+++ scripts/sc Tue Mar 29 10:49:43 2005
@@ -243,12 +243,6 @@
/dev/stderr
exit 1
fi
- echo "$RES" | grep "^200" > /dev/null
- if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
- echo "error: overlap with an existing alias" \
- > /dev/stderr
- exit 1
- fi
# other errors
echo "error: $RES" > /dev/stderr
exit 1