Read RFC3261 for branch values in Via or search this mailing for answers on
this.
sipsak just sends what you gave to it. It does not try to fix broken messages.
If you want to send broken messages, e.g. for testing purpose, you are free
to do so.
BTW: there is a From header in your NOTIFIY, but it misses the "tag"
parameter!!!
NO
On Friday 20 May 2005 14:36, Iqbal wrote:
why do I need a branch, havent seen this in any of the
docs on SIP and
NOTIFY method, I am using sipsak to generate the message
Iqbal
Iqbal wrote:
> From is there, but branch isnt
>
> Iqbal
>
> Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>> Your message does not have a branch value and no From tag.
>>
>> NO
>>
>> On Friday 20 May 2005 13:51, Iqbal wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> As an update, have managed to remove the "too many hops" error,
but now
>>> have this
>>>
>>> ERROR: TM module: t_lookup_request: too few headers
>>> 3(27346) parse_headers: flags=4
>>> 3(27346) parse_headers: flags=-1
>>> 3(27346) check_via_address(a.b.c.d,
sip-voip.net, 0)
>>> 3(27346) ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Transaction tuple incomplete
>>> (9/SL)
>>> 3(27346) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
>>> 3(27346) receive_msg: cleaning up
>>>
>>> not sure which headers I'm missing, or how many there should be
>>>
>>> iqbal
>>>
>>> Iqbal wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to send
>>>>
>>>> NOTIFY sip:040600@sip.domain.com SIP/2.0
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP a.b.c.d:5060
>>>> From: <sip:vmserver@sip.domain.com>
>>>> To: <sip:040600@sip.domain.com>
>>>> Contact: <sip:040600@a.b.c.d>
>>>> Call-ID: 4d61cf9e505d40e905032a18329d61ec(a)a.b.c.d
>>>> CSeq: 1 NOTIFY
>>>> User-Agent: VoiceMail
>>>> Event: message-summary
>>>> Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary
>>>> Content-Length: 40
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Messages-Waiting: yes
>>>> Voicemail: 23/2
>>>>
>>>> using
>>>>
>>>> if (src_ip == a.b.c.d) {
>>>> log(1, "INSIDE ROUTE 2");
>>>> if (!t_relay()) {
>>>> sl_reply_error();
>>>> break;
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> in my NOTIFY route
>>>>
>>>> however I keep getting too many hops. Should sipsak send the message
>>>> to ser, or should it go direct to the IPphone, I am guessing at the
>>>> former.
>>>>
>>>> Iqbal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> .