Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio HA with Virtual IP and multiple Asterisk servers for dispatching

Hi again and thank you for your help, This is what happened when I changed the flags to 8 and restarted both kamailios ACTIVE KAMAILIO SET_NO:: 2 SET:: 2 URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=AP priority=1 attrs= SET:: 1 URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=AP priority=1 attrs= PASSIVE KAMAILIO SET_NO:: 1 SET:: 1 URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= When I stop kamailio 1 kamailio two takes the Virtual IP and everything works like a charm, when I start kamailio 1 again the same issue appears calls are only routed to the 10.2.45.103 asterisk.... What might be the problem that they are in different set ? On 28 November 2012 18:37, SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Well these are two different dispatcher groups, one is SET:1 10.2.45.98 > where the calls are routed - the other one is SET:2 which you are definitely > not calling in your ds_select() function. > > Also the flags=IP are, I think, saying that asterisk servers are inactive > and kamailio is probing them, not sure about it. mine always show me > flags=AP for active servers. > > Also how have you defined the > > ds_ping_reply_codes > http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/3.2.x/modules_k/dispatcher.html#id2495… > > Parameter such that if asterisk responds with a 484 or 404 or anyother > negative response to the dispatcher OPTIONS SIP ping then consider it > active. > > Hope this will get your issue resolved. > > The thing is the dispatcher in kamailio or load-balancer in OpenSIPS both > set the Initial flags of all the servers in the table to Active/Enabled ! > that means if I have a server which is down and I reload the dispatcher > module it will mark that down server to UP and my calls will timeout trying > to send calls to that instance ! > > Thanks, > Sammy > > > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1662(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello Samy, >> >> this is what I got: >> >> >> SET_NO:: 2 >> SET:: 2 >> URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= >> SET:: 1 >> URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= >> >> >> on both machines. Moreover now without any changes dispatcher is not >> working at all. Only sending calls to the asterisk-1 (10.2.45.98) >> >> On 28 November 2012 18:20, SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi again, >> > >> > I think instead of dispatcher show use "kamctl dispatcher dump" That >> > will >> > show you the kamailio status of these servers. The flag 0, I'm not sure >> > about that I always use 8 to re-activate the server if the ping gets >> > back. >> > >> > Hope to hear from you >> > -- >> > Sammy >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1662(a)gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello again, >> >> >> >> I was able to perform tests and this is the output: >> >> Kamailio-1: 10.2.45.106 >> >> Kamailio-2: 10.2.45.109 >> >> Asterisk-1: 10.2.45.98 >> >> Asterisk-2: 10.2.45.103 >> >> >> >> I can ping both asterisks from both kamailios >> >> here are stats: >> >> FROM KAMAILIO-1 >> >> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98 >> >> PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data. >> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.315 ms >> >> ^C >> >> --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics --- >> >> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 773ms >> >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.315/0.315/0.315/0.000 ms >> >> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103 >> >> PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data. >> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.489 ms >> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.268 ms >> >> >> >> FROM KAMAILIO-2 >> >> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98 >> >> PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data. >> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.46 ms >> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.324 ms >> >> ^C >> >> --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics --- >> >> 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1036ms >> >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.324/0.893/1.462/0.569 ms >> >> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103 >> >> PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data. >> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.09 ms >> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.350 ms >> >> ^C >> >> >> >> Those are the 'kamctl dispatcher show' outputs: >> >> KAMAILIO 1 >> >> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show >> >> dispatcher gateways >> >> >> >> >> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >> >> | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | >> >> description | >> >> >> >> >> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >> >> | 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >> >> asterisk-1 | >> >> | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >> >> asterisk-2 | >> >> >> >> >> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >> >> >> >> KAMAILIO 2 >> >> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show >> >> dispatcher gateways >> >> >> >> >> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >> >> | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | >> >> description | >> >> >> >> >> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >> >> | 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >> >> asterisk-1 | >> >> | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >> >> asterisk-2 | >> >> >> >> >> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >> >> >> >> Both asterisks can also ping both kamailios >> >> >> >> ds_select_dst("1","4"); >> >> >> >> this is what I have in my route[TOASTERISK] >> >> >> >> Any thought guys ? >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Rumen >> >> >> >> On 28 November 2012 09:55, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1662(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hello Samy, >> >> > >> >> > Thank you for the hint, I will test later today and let you know the >> >> > results. >> >> > >> >> > Best regards, >> >> > Rumen >> >> > >> >> > On 28 November 2012 07:00, SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> Just few quick questions , can you ping the second asterisk from >> >> >> secondary >> >> >> Kamailio ? what is the routing set for that. Does your second >> >> >> asterisk >> >> >> box >> >> >> gets inactive in dispatcher show command after 30 seconds ? >> >> >> Mine worked fine, the key is the linux routing table. >> >> >> >> >> >> BR >> >> >> Sammy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rumen Mihailov >> >> >> <zealas1662(a)gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> .s. Thank you for creating such a wonderful product. Thank you !!! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> >> >> list >> >> >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> >> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >