27 May
2011
27 May
'11
12:44 p.m.
The debate from my point of view was the _architecture of the
protocols_: sip vs msrp -- read it to some extent like: structure of the
messages. You go very much to specifics on existing sip for voice --
like it is unimaginable to have some requests (for content of
communication) within a dialog following different path than INVITE and
BYE (or the requests that control the session) when it is more optimal.
I provided just leads to similar mechanisms, not the specs of how it
must be done. It is nothing I should argument, what you summarized it is
what you extracted/understood, but it is not what I meant it must be.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 5/27/11 10:41 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2011/5/27 Daniel-Constantin
Mierla<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
I wonder if you really read to understand or just
spot 'single concepts' to
make them out of the context in order to reply something. That is endless
and topic breaker.
Hi Daniel, that is not my aim.