11 Oct
2003
11 Oct
'03
7:51 a.m.
At 04:40 AM 10/11/2003, Gavin Bensom wrote:
Jiri,
Is it possible to run two instances of ser on the same box, one acting as the proxy and
the other acting as the voicemail2email server, or are to different boxes required?
I never tried -- it should, but better verify it. Just try two different
SER's at two different port numbers. Take stable version from CVS for both
SER and voicemail -- I made some recent alignments to better deal with
scenarios like these.
Can you comment a little more on how to get SER as a
proxy to transfer messages to SER as a UAS, both on a single box [if this is possible],
and/or in a two box setup.
That's script fragments for the fronting proxy that should make the
job (not verified either):
# does the user wish redirection on no availability? (i.e., is he
# in the voicemail group?) -- determine it now and store it in
# flag 4, before we rewrite the flag using UsrLoc
if (is_user_in("Request-URI", "voicemail")) {
setflag(4);
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
# handle user which was not found
if f (isflagset(4)) route(4);
break;
};
# if user is on-line and is in voicemail group, enable redirection
if (method == "INVITE" && isflagset(4)) {
t_on_failure("1");
};
....
route[4] {
rewritehostport("foo.bar:1234");
t_relay();
}
...
failure_route[1] {
revert_uri();
lookup("aliases");
rewritehostport("bat.iptel.org:5090");
append_branch();
t_relay();
}
I'd really like to do all this on one box as its
much more economical.
I will try to get back to you with a "single-ser" config too --
I just happened to run out of time in the past week and will
not be any better off next too weeks.
-jiri