On 10/27/10 9:54 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
On 10/27/2010 12:43 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
Now, if it is easier for you to count hex codes
by hart in a combined
content, then it is fine. For me is easier to get the body in text
format and use wc tool to count.
Except it is hard to say if there is CR, CRLF, LF
(whatever) at the
end of the message :-)
not sure what version you use, but in my ngpre, and as far
as I can
remember in the past, CR and LF were always printed as dot '.' unless
you use -W byline when the LF is printed as new line, CR is still '.'.
Further you can use -P to change the '.' to something else
So regarding the content length that is enough and I do use the command
for long time to check the body size -- if you have -W byline just add
'wc -l'.
But counting by hart, with wc or something else is a completely
different story and maybe was not clear in my first email as people
started to debate this instead of trying to figure out the real problem,
so repeating here -- I haven't doubted that the content length header
value is different that the size of the body, as Tony said that clear.
I asked ngrep or pcap to see if the body was altered by the proxy or is
the one from the other phone. I mentioned the proxy does not change the
body and content length unless is nat traversal involved (or, of course,
textops-like changes to body).
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com