On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Pascal Maugeri <pascal.maugeri@gmail.com> wrote:

BTW, do you have any benchmark figures you could share with us regarding rtpproxy and mediaproxy performances ?

The only thing I found (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Portaone+rtpproxy) is:
"It should be able to handle up to 2,000 simulateneous G.729 sessions on a decent machine (P4 2.5-3.0 GHz)"

-pascal

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Gang Lau <gangban.lau@gmail.com> wrote:

yes. I tried rtpproxy and mediaproxy before. rtpproxy is more efficiency. but mediaproxy is very good at cluster.

regards,

Gang

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Pezhman Lali <pezhman_lali@yahoo.com> wrote:

I think rtpproxy, because of c programming, has more
efficiency, rather than scripting(mediaproxy)

--- MagoDaViola <magodaviola@ig.com.br> wrote:

> Untitled Document

> Hi...
>
> What´s the best system in performance question, to
> use NAT MediaProxy or RTPProxy?
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Alcindo Schleder
> Sistema Processa Acessoria e Comunicações
> Ltda.
>

> a.. MSN: a_schleder@hotmail.com
> b.. Skipe: alcindo_schleder

> Demétrio P. dos Santos, 705 - 95670-000 -
> Gramado-RS-Brasil
> Celular + 55 54 9966 7591
> alcindo@processa.org
> Fone +55 54 3286-1738 comercial@processa.org
>

> > _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.openser.org
>
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users