11 Jul
2007
11 Jul
'07
9:57 p.m.
This piece of config makes sense, but it does not include failure_route
as you had asked before. From within failure_route, call t_reply to
complete transactino processing, don't call sl_send_reply.
-jiri
At 20:12 11/07/2007, JF wrote:
So, the following snippet doesn't make sense in a
failure route?
I may try to call t_relay inside a failure route, and, if it fails,
send a stateless reply back...
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_send_reply("500","Error relaying");
exit;
};
JF
On 7/11/07, Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote:
At 16:34 11/07/2007, JF wrote:
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ Hi all,
Is there any particular reason why sl module functions cannot be used
in failure routes?
Yes. Failure_route is only invoked from within stateful processing.
If a request was processed statelessly, SER does not really know if
it failed.
-jiri
I want to send a stateless reply in failure
route.
JF
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/