Because the history of this module is with the userspace rtpproxy and because it aims to be (mostly) compatible with the rtpproxy module in terms of how it's engaged.

--
Sent from my BlackBerry. Please excuse errors and brevity.
From: Kalala Alexander
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] RTPengine

Why, then, documentation writing about this flag "force"?
 
19.01.2015, 15:54, "Alex Balashov" <abalashov@evaristesys.com>:
Correct. Not supported.
 
 
--
Sent from my BlackBerry. Please excuse errors and brevity.
From: Kalala Alexander
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 7:45 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] RTPengine
 

Hey there!

Have a question modulo rtpengine.
 
Function rtpengine_offer ([flags]):
  • force - instructs the RTP proxy to ignore marks inserted by another RTP proxy in transit to indicate that the session is already goes through another proxy. Allows creating a chain of proxies. Not supported and ignored by Sipwise rtpengine.

It is not clear, this flag "force" does not work in this module?
 
--
С уважением
Инженер по телекоммуникациям 
Калала Александр 
vel: 375291146285
life: 375256819996
skype: klistrod
 
VoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexander
http://callcenters.by/
http://skytel.by/
http://voiplab.by/
http://asterisk-pbx.by/
 
 
,

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

 
 
--
С уважением
Инженер по телекоммуникациям 
Калала Александр 
vel: 375291146285
life: 375256819996
skype: klistrod
 
VoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexander
http://callcenters.by/
http://skytel.by/
http://voiplab.by/
http://asterisk-pbx.by/