7 Feb
2012
7 Feb
'12
10:54 a.m.
Hello,
On 2/7/12 10:37 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
7 feb 2012 kl. 10:21 skrev Henning Westerholt:
it worked for me when I tried
few months ago, but I didn't compiled all
*exotic* modules. Nothing major changed since then in 3.2 branch.
For modules with dependencies on libs, maybe soon most libs will have a
pkg-config profile or provide some xyz-config tool to get compile and
link flags. Then all these include dirs and link flags lists would be no
long os dependent hardcoded in Makefile. If anyone here know that a lib
provides such tool, but we don't use it in Makefile, just send a patch
or email to sr-dev list.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
On Monday 06 February 2012, Serhat AKCA wrote:
I just compiled 3.2.2 on FreeBSD.
Some modules require me to add /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include in the search path
in the make files, which surprises me.
Somehow it works on most modules, but not all.
I'll try to come up with an ugly patch for that. I want to run Kamailio under FreeBSD. I compiled
with the makefiles under
freebsd packages. But It gives alotof errors. I want to use 3.2.2 version
but I cannot compile. Could you help me To compile in FreeBSD ?
Hi Serhat,
a common error is that people use 'make' instead of 'gmake', if I
remember
correctly. Can you specifiy the errors you've got, then other people could
have a look as well .
Another question, which is the best OS for
Kamailio ? In the forums, they
are saying FreeBSD is more stable and More performans.
The best OS? Well, most
developers and also users use not a BSD variant, but
Linux, not sure if this is an option for you. Olle (also on this list) have
some experiences with FreeBSD as well, they were some discussions on the sr-
dev list some month ago.