Hello

that would be great, despite not needing it now, it would be great, there are 3 x00 in the isup i wanted to set, but 2 are from FCI and optional FCI, and the third is for the called party, which can be changed with sipt functions.
anycase, the FCI could be an issue in some scenarios, so an option to let the kamailio get the x00 would be great

besides, i have another issue with textops, setting body multipart

Aug  3 11:11:03  /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4190]: INFO: <core> [msg_translator.c:1692]: get_boundary(): Content-Type hdr has no params <application/sdp>
Aug  3 11:11:03 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4190]: WARNING: <core> [msg_translator.c:1958]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): check_boundaries error

but i think there is already another query with this so i will check there

best regards
david



El mar, 02-08-2016 a las 09:22 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
Hello,

maybe the function append_body_part("...") can be extended with an extra parameter where to specify the character to be replaced with 0x00 in the first parameter.

Cheers,
Daniel



On 01/08/16 16:34, Sergey Basov wrote:

Hello.

Look more carefuly, its only first \x00 changes forward call indicator. You have a few more \x00...

You does not get full ISUP into INVITE...

As I have told earlier you can replace \x00 by \x01into kamailio script, but you must rewrite it with \x00 later into sip-t module, but this requires some changes into source code of sip-t module...

sip-t module itself designed for checking/modifying of the ISUP content into sip-t/sip-i, but not for generating it...


1 авг. 2016 г. 5:08 PM пользователь "david" <descartin@bts.io> написал:
Hello Sergey, Daniel

thanks a lot for the guidance.
i changed the x00 by x01 and it works now, i was seeing the ISUP truncated but i thought it was related to the tshark XD

i will find out about the changes needed at sipt configuration, but just in case, the things chaged by this only are the forward call indicators, so i hope that does give us many problems....

i will let you know anything

thanks and best regards
david


El lun, 01-08-2016 a las 12:09 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: 
Hello,

I am not familiar with isup and no testbed around at this moment. That's
why I asked for backtrace from the coredump file, based on the
guidelines I did in my previous email.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 01/08/16 09:07, Sergey Basov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> try make dump packet after
> append_body_part("\x01\x12\x49\x00\x0a\x03\x02\x0a\x08\x84\x90\x33\x41\x72\x17\x00\x06\x0a\x08\x04\x13\x93\x70\x21\x73\x23\x10\x08\x01\x00\x00","application/isup;version=itu-t92+","signal;handling=optional");
> before sipt_destination($rU, 31, 4);
>
> when i have done such conversion i found that kamailio from script
> ignores all string content after symbol \x00 as this is end of line.
>
> To avoid this i have replaces \x00 with \x01 in my initial ISUP string
> and make changes into SIP-T module to replace it with \x00 while
> processing message. before number/presentation/screening
> modifications.
>
> you have first \x00 as forth symbol in your ISUP string and after it
> all have to be ignored. Look at dump using wireshark. I think you will
> see mailformed ISUP incapsulated message.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey Basov                     e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
>
> tel: (+38067) 403-62-54
>
>
> 2016-08-01 8:21 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> would be good to get a core dump file and the backtrace from it in order to
>> see where it crashes.
>>
>> For getting the coredump, try:
>>
>>  - stop kamailio
>>
>>  - do: ulimit -c unlimited
>>
>>  - start kamailio as root
>>
>>  - reproduce the issue
>>
>> A corefile should be generated in / or working directory. Use gdb to grab
>> the output of 'bt full' from the corefile and send it here to the mailing
>> list.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 29/07/16 18:21, david wrote:
>>
>> hello all
>>
>>
>>
>> i'm trying to add a ISUP multipart in a regular call using the textops
>> module, and despite seeing one previous issue int he mail list, i'm finding
>> some issue here
>>
>> i'm using this commands
>>
>>     msg_apply_changes();
>>     set_body_multipart(,"2123894789_1257887457");
>>     msg_apply_changes();
>>
>> append_body_part("\x01\x12\x49\x00\x0a\x03\x02\x0a\x08\x84\x90\x33\x41\x72\x17\x00\x06\x0a\x08\x04\x13\x93\x70\x21\x73\x23\x10\x08\x01\x00\x00","application/isup;version=itu-t92+","signal;handling=optional");
>>     msg_apply_changes();
>>     sipt_destination($rU, 31, 4);
>>     sipt_set_calling($fU, 4, 0, 3);
>>     msg_apply_changes();
>>
>> before the record_route command, and when using sipt_destination($rU, 31,
>> 4); i'm getting asegfault
>>
>> here you have the logs
>> could you please give me any clue about something i'm missing or doing
>> wrong?
>>
>> thanks  alot and regards
>> david
>>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg():  method:
>> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg():  uri:
>> <sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg():  version:
>> <SIP/2.0>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of header
>> reached, state=5
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:178]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:221]: receive_msg(): preparing to run
>> routing scripts...
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 65
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]: parse_addr_spec():
>> end of header reached, state=10
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>> uri=[sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to
>> body [<sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>> ]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_body : content_length=104
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end
>> of header
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:172]: parse_to_param():
>> DEBUG: add_param: tag=5jBBFae4D90rg
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]: parse_addr_spec():
>> end of header reached, state=29
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:248]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks
>> result: 1
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:564]: grep_sock_info(): checking if
>> host==us: 13==13 && [79.170.71.132] == [79.170.71.132]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:567]: grep_sock_info(): checking if
>> port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg
>> id=1 global id=0 T start=0xffffffffffffffff
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request:
>> start searching: hash=46859, isACK=0
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261
>> transaction matching failed
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG:
>> t_lookup_request: no transaction found
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg
>> id=1 global id=1 T end=(nil)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1312]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg
>> id=1 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request:
>> start searching: hash=46859, isACK=0
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261
>> transaction matching failed
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG:
>> t_lookup_request: no transaction found
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:358]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG:
>> trans=0x7fb3fb0c64e0, callback type 1, id 0 entered
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated:
>> 5ea9736b3bdcf90a4c3043a5a492b31f
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [select.c:412]: run_select(): Calling SELECT
>> 0x7fb404252ef8
>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208 /
>> Call-ID 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Call-ID =
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:643]: app_lua_run(): reload
>> deactivated
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:644]: app_lua_run(): executing Lua
>> function: [[allow_src_uri]]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:645]: app_lua_run(): lua top index
>> is: 4
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>> $avp(s:call_obj)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:call_obj)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get: $ci
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar [$ci] found in
>> cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $var(authorized)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$var(authorized)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208 /
>> Call-ID 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Method INVITE from
>> 79.170.64.130:5080 authorized
>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Object 58825 assigned to Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208
>> 5(24552) INFO: Theseus-Test Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: The call has been sent to RG 106406
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:643]: app_lua_run(): reload
>> deactivated
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:644]: app_lua_run(): executing Lua
>> function: [[get_rg_info]]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:645]: app_lua_run(): lua top index
>> is: 4
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get: $ci
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar [$ci] found in
>> cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>> $avp(s:call_obj)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:call_obj)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>> $shv(flag_list)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar [$shv(flag_list)]
>> added in cache
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG 106406 attributes:
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 description =
>> PBX--NOC-TEST
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 admin_status = 1
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 cir_direction = 2
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 ani_posttranslation = 0
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406
>> ani_posttranslation_table = 0
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 posttranslation = 1
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 posttranslation_table =
>> 106384
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 pound = 2
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 gw_port = 5060
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: RG OUT 106406 custom_flags = None
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:description)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:882]: parse_avp_ident(): Parsing
>> 's:description'
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:description)] added in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:admin_status)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:admin_status)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:cir_direction)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:882]: parse_avp_ident(): Parsing
>> 's:cir_direction'
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:cir_direction)] added in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:ani_posttranslation_table)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:ani_posttranslation_table)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:posttranslation_table)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:posttranslation_table)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:pound)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:pound)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:gw_ip)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:gw_ip)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:1101]: lua_sr_pv_sets(): pv set:
>> $avp(s:gw_port)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:321]: pv_cache_lookup(): pvar
>> [$avp(s:gw_port)] found in cache
>> 5(24552) INFO: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:96]: lua_sr_log(): Call 58825 / Call-ID
>> 69672589-67f5-4edd-8844-f6ad2ee5b208: Custom flags = None
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>> $shv(custom_flag_list)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>> [$shv(custom_flag_list)] added in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:979]: lua_sr_pv_get(): pv get:
>> $shv(custom_flag_list_branch)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [pvapi.c:293]: pv_cache_add(): pvar
>> [$shv(custom_flag_list_branch)] added in cache
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textopsx [textopsx.c:231]: msg_apply_changes_f(): SIP
>> message content updated - reparsing
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg():  method:
>> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg():  uri:
>> <sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg():  version:
>> <SIP/2.0>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of header
>> reached, state=5
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1577]: set_multibody_helper():
>> delimiter<21>:[2123894789_1257887457]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]: parse_addr_spec():
>> end of header reached, state=10
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>> uri=[sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to
>> body [<sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>> ]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_body : content_length=104
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end
>> of header
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1486]: generate_boundary(): adding final
>> CRLF+CRLF
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1714]: set_multibody_helper():
>> content-type<48>:[multipart/mixed;boundary="2123894789_1257887457"]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1768]: set_multibody_helper(): set flag
>> FL_BODY_MULTIPART
>> 5(24552) INFO: <core> [msg_translator.c:1692]: get_boundary(): Content-Type
>> hdr has no params <application/sdp>
>> 5(24552) WARNING: <core> [msg_translator.c:1958]:
>> build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): check_boundaries error
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:422]: clen_builder():
>> content-length: 189 (189)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textopsx [textopsx.c:231]: msg_apply_changes_f(): SIP
>> message content updated - reparsing
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg():  method:
>> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg():  uri:
>> <sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg():  version:
>> <SIP/2.0>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of header
>> reached, state=5
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>> 5(24552) ERROR: <core> [lvalue.c:345]: lval_pvar_assign(): non existing
>> right pvar
>> 5(24552) ERROR: <core> [lvalue.c:405]: lval_assign(): assignment failed at
>> pos: (390,18-390,44)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]: parse_addr_spec():
>> end of header reached, state=10
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>> uri=[sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to
>> body [<sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>> ]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_body : content_length=189
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end
>> of header
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1486]: generate_boundary(): adding final
>> CRLF+CRLF
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1719]: get_boundary(): boundary is
>> <--2123894789_1257887457>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1839]: check_boundaries(): last
>> bondary without -- at the end
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1639]: replace_body(): old size
>> body[189] actual[319]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:422]: clen_builder():
>> content-length: 319 (319)
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: textopsx [textopsx.c:231]: msg_apply_changes_f(): SIP
>> message content updated - reparsing
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg():  method:
>> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg():  uri:
>> <sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg():  version:
>> <SIP/2.0>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found
>> param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7ma5t4FKS0SKa>; state=16
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of header
>> reached, state=5
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers():
>> parse_headers: this is the first via
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894]: parse_addr_spec():
>> end of header reached, state=10
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_field: <To> [49];
>> uri=[sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to
>> body [<sip:34666988297@79.170.71.132:5060;user=phone>
>> ]
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field():
>> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <94568362> <INVITE>
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG:
>> get_hdr_body : content_length=319
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_body.c:87]: get_boundary_param():
>> boundary is "2123894789_1257887457"
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end
>> of header
>> 5(24552) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_body.c:87]: get_boundary_param():
>> boundary is "2123894789_1257887457"
>> 5(24552) CRITICAL: <core> [data_lump.c:297]: del_lump(): offset + len
>> exceeds message size (1176 + 51 > 1201)
>> 35(24582) CRITICAL: <core> [pass_fd.c:275]: receive_fd(): EOF on 17
>> 35(24582) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3448]: handle_ser_child(): dead child 5,
>> pid 24552 (shutting down?)
>> 35(24582) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:598]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del
>> (0xa2ae40, 17, -1, 0x0) fd_no=39 called
>> 0(24547) ALERT: <core> [main.c:739]: handle_sigs(): child process 24552
>> exited by a signal 6
>> 0(24547) ALERT: <core> [main.c:742]: handle_sigs(): core was not generated
>> 0(24547) INFO: <core> [main.c:754]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to
>> SIGCHLD
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:756]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to
>> SIGCHLD
>> 34(24581) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 33(24580) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 32(24579) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 31(24578) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 30(24577) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 29(24576) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 28(24575) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 27(24574) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 26(24573) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 25(24572) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 24(24571) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 23(24570) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 22(24569) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 21(24568) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 20(24567) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 19(24566) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 18(24565) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 17(24564) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 16(24563) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 15(24562) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 14(24561) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 13(24560) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 12(24559) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 11(24558) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 10(24557) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 9(24556) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 8(24555) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 7(24554) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 6(24553) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 4(24551) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 3(24550) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 2(24549) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 1(24548) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 35(24582) INFO: <core> [main.c:809]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2014]: mod_destroy():
>> rtpengine_hash_table_destroy() success!
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: db_text [dbtext.c:110]: destroy(): destroy ...
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:86]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:89]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>> emptying hash table
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:127]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction
>> 0x7fb3fb0c64e0 from h_table.c:449
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:91]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>> removing semaphores
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:93]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown :
>> destroying tmcb lists
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:96]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown : done
>> 0(24547) INFO: <core> [sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not
>> initialized
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm.c:174]: shm_core_lock_destroy(): destroying
>> the shared memory lock
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm.c:266]: shm_destroy_manager(): destroying
>> memory manager: f_malloc
>> 0(24547) DEBUG: <core> [mem/pkg.c:89]: pkg_destroy_manager(): destroying
>> memory manager: f_malloc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>





-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda