Hello, yes, you were right.

There was something wrong in my routing config.

See below, I remove the bad config.

Thank you very much

route[WITHINDLG] {

……

….

      if (loose_route()) {

                route(DLGURI);

                if (is_method("BYE")) {

                        setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ...

                        setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails

                } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {

                        # ACK is forwarded statelessy

                        route(NATMANAGE);

                } else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {

                        # Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as per RFC 6665.

                        record_route();

                }

                     else if ( is_method("INVITE") ) {

                          # even if in most of the cases is useless, do RR for

                  # re-INVITEs alos, as some buggy clients do change route set

                  # during the dialog.

                  xlog("Route with in Dialog: loose route $rU -> $fU\n");

                  record_route();

                }

                route(RELAY);

                exit;

        }

……

….

}

Regards

2017-06-15 16:27 GMT+02:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov@gmail.com>:

Do you only change topoh to topos in your config? 

You can find my dump attached. There is duplicate packets this is issue of my capture architecture.. 

--
WBR
Sergey Basov

15 июня 2017 г. 5:20 PM пользователь "Sergey Basov" <sergey.v.basov@gmail.com> написал:

Its very strange... 

I have record routes from 1 side and from another side, they are stripped and restored normaly.

On reinvite you have incorrect contact restored. 

I will look at my config. 

--
WBR
Sergey Basov

15 июня 2017 г. 5:09 PM пользователь "Abdoul Osséni" <abdoul.osseni@gmail.com> написал:

The record route is missing with topos module. Maybe it is that the problem?

Regards.

2017-06-15 16:04 GMT+02:00 Abdoul Osséni <abdoul.osseni@gmail.com>:

I tried with an another uac (without +sip.instance="<urn:uuid:14d62d4f-8426-486b-88ee-077b9ff1fae2>" in contact).  Same issue.

I checked my routing logic in Kamailio. Same configs describe ici : http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb?s[]=asterisk.

Regards

Abdoul.

2017-06-15 14:34 GMT+02:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov@gmail.com>:

I checked in my environment all ok.

Can you try without +sip.instance="<urn:uuid:14d62d4f-8426-486b-88ee-077b9ff1fae2>" in contact?

--
Best regards,
Sergey Basov                     e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com

2017-06-15 12:52 GMT+03:00 Abdoul Osséni <abdoul.osseni@gmail.com>:

Please find in attachment.

• topos module is disabled
• topoh module is enabled

I have no issue -- the contact header is updated.

I have only this issue when topos module is enabled but I will check again my routing logic in kamailio.

Regards

2017-06-15 11:39 GMT+02:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov@gmail.com>:

I think you may have some error in your routing logic in kamailio...

Can you try to disable topos module and try with topoh to see does it handles contact modification properly?

--
Best regards,
Sergey Basov                     e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com

2017-06-15 12:07 GMT+03:00 Abdoul Osséni <abdoul.osseni@gmail.com>:

Hi,

Please find in attachment the pcap file.

Regards

Abdoul

2017-06-15 9:43 GMT+02:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov@gmail.com>:

Hello,

Can you send dump of the both side of call.

I using this module into production I have a lot of Re-Invites and does not have this problem.

--
Best regards,
Sergey Basov                     e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com

2017-06-15 10:18 GMT+03:00 Abdoul Osséni <abdoul.osseni@gmail.com>:

Hello,

I have an issue when loading topos module on Kamailio 5.0.2 version.

root@proxy:/home/tcpdump# kamailio -V

version: kamailio 5.0.2 (x86_64/linux)

The call flow is: uac --> kamailio --> Asterisk

1) Invite from uac

2) Kamailio forward the invite to asterisk

3) asterisk send 200 OK to kamailio

4) kamailio send 200 OK to uac -> in the conctact header, i can see the IP address of kamailio

5) uac send ACK to kamailio and kamailio forward the ACK to Asterisk

6) uac send re-invite: "media change" to kamailio.

7) kamailio forward the re-invite to asterisk and asterisk send 200 OK to kamailio

8) kamailio send 200 ok to uac --> but the contact header contains IP of Asterisk and not kamailio: is it normal?

Thank for you help.

Regards

--

Abdoul OSSENI

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

--

Abdoul OSSENI

Ingénieur Réseaux et systèmes chez THALES

Co-Fondateur de ON SERVICES

Tél : +33 601 135 167

--

Abdoul OSSENI

Ingénieur Réseaux et systèmes chez THALES

Co-Fondateur de ON SERVICES

Tél : +33 601 135 167

--

Abdoul OSSENI

Ingénieur Réseaux et systèmes chez THALES

Co-Fondateur de ON SERVICES

Tél : +33 601 135 167

--

Abdoul OSSENI

Ingénieur Réseaux et systèmes chez THALES

Co-Fondateur de ON SERVICES

Tél : +33 601 135 167