21 Jul
2005
21 Jul
'05
11:12 a.m.
Hello,
On 07/21/05 02:04, Iqbal wrote:
Hi
I am looking at upgrading soon, and am looking both at ser and openser,
without wanting to open a can of worms, what is better, the features
look pretty much the same, not sure if there are any changes to the
underlying code, in terms of speed etc etc.
I like some of the features in the roadmap of ser, if anyone has migrated
from ser to openser, and has any pointers let me know, would be nice to
be able to go back and forth, between them both, but I dont think
openser cfg is compatible down to some features.
only openser 0.9.x can run ser 0.9.x config file, in the development
branch there were some major changes (pseudo-variable support in core
and several modules, return code and switch statements, ... -- see the
roadmap for more: http://openser.org/roadmap.php or take a look at
ChangeLog file from source tree).
But you can have both installed since they use different names/paths and
run just one at a moment. The problem is with user location because they
use different approaches to store details for natted users, otherwise
the database structure is similar.
Daniel
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users