22 Feb
2013
22 Feb
'13
9:43 a.m.
If the add the Path header manually, then it is not seen by the
registrar/usrloc module, asthe header will only be added when generating
the "to be forwarded" message - and this never happens as the message
terminates on the registrar. You could try msg_apply_changes() after
adding the Path header.
regards
Klaus
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules/textopsx.html#textopsx.msg_a…
On 22.02.2013 00:33, Charles Chance wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I did try that, but the path is still not stored in location table on
save. I have "use_path" parameter of registrar module enabled.
On 21 February 2013 23:17, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com
<mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>> wrote:
Hi,
you cannot use add_path(), but by creating your own Path header this
works, e.g.:
append_hf("Path: <sip:term@HOSTNAME:"+PORT+";lr>\r\n");
(from our P-CSCF config)
Then your Proxy should also evaluate the DNS-SRV records.
Kind regards,
Carsten
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
============================================================= Die
ng-voice GmbH ist auf der Kamailio World 2013, 16./17. April 2013
=>
http://conference.kamailio.com/k01/========================================…
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com <mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
Hi All,
Given a situation where there are multiple registrars, behind a
single load balancer, sharing the same location table in DB, I
understand that Path can be used to ensure everything works nicely
with clients behind NAT. So, if UA1 is registered on P1, UA2 on P2,
and UA1 calls UA2... P1 performs lookup, sees path and sends via P2.
What about situations where the distribution between registrars is
being handled client-side through DNS SRV, not a load balancer? Path
cannot be used then, right? As I understand it, in this instance
add_path() will do nothing, is this correct?
Thanks in advance,
Charles
www.sipcentric.com <http://www.sipcentric.com/>
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592.
Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court
South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
www.sipcentric.com <http://www.sipcentric.com/>
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592.
Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court
South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users