Re: [SR-Users] Possible conflict between t_newtran and setflag for ACC

Hello, usually it is not needed anymore to do this t_newtran early in the cfg. Check this discussion from 2015 out: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Transaction-good-practices-with-t-r… There is also another function in tmx, t_precheck_trans which can be used to detect re-transmissions without actually creating a new one. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/> From: sr-users &lt;sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; On Behalf Of Patrick Wakano Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 3:26 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List &lt;sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] Possible conflict between t_newtran and setflag for ACC Hello list, Hope you all doing well! I am using the ACC module and using the setflag() function as done in several examples. It works fine. However, I've added the t_newtran() function almost in the begging of the INVITE handler to help the retransmission detection and after that I noticed the ACC was not saving anything in DB. So after debugging I discovered that if I call the t_newtran() before setting the ACC flags, the module will not save the calls in DB, but if I call it after setting the ACC flags, it works.... So my question is, is this a bug or it is a expected side effect so when one is using t_newtran you must be careful and set all your transaction flags before? (ACC are the only transaction flags I am using so can't tell if other modules have the same problem) This is happening in Kamailio 5.2.2. Thank you! Kind regards, Patrick Wakano