18 Feb
2008
18 Feb
'08
1:11 p.m.
Hi Juha,
This will be definitely a better solution as it will be more efficient
from load point of view - the question is how portable (general
supported) is the TCP keepalive setting - this will need some investigation.
Regards,
Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
I was paying some second thoughts to some
discussions we had some time
ago, about embedding some automation for some very standard behaviours,
in order to reduce the scripting complexity.....
I will attack this issue during the next week IRC meeting.
one thing that was considered earlier, was turn on tcp keepalive option
in those OSes (e.g. linux) that support it. it would solve NAT keepalive
issue for those UAs that don't support CRLF keepalive defined in
outbound.
for AUs closing the connection, the best cure is to not use them.
-- juha