13 Oct
2015
13 Oct
'15
1:59 p.m.
Hello,
maybe you can reproduce the same situation using tcp and grab a network
trace (ngrep with at least -t) for such a call to see what woould be the
difference of time between those packets. Maybe the transaction is
already destroyed.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 09/10/15 16:22, John Billings wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
Hello,
look at:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.p.cancel_b_method
Maybe one or another value for that parameter is suiting better your use
case.
Thank you for the suggestion.
This looked promising, but the cancel_b_method parameter is already at the default value
of one. I also tried changing the value to two and got a similar result.
This may sound crazy, but it almost seems like the problem happens only when kamailio is
processing unrelated INVITES at the same time.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users