Re: [OpenSER-Users] presence module dialog handling

Unfortunately I jumped to conclusions to quickly. The NOTIFY requests are not sent anymore when the watcher is "polite-block"-ed, but now they are also not sent anymore to watchers that are allowed. An allowed watcher only receives the correct presence state of the presentity when he initiates the subscription. kind regards, Sigrid Sigrid Thijs wrote: > Thanks, that fixed it. > > kind regards, > > Sigrid > > Anca Vamanu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have just committed a fix. Could you please update to the svn >> version of presence module. Or take the patch from here >> http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser/branches/1.3/modules/pres… >> <http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser/branches/1.3/modules/presence/notify.c?r1=4265&r2=4264&view=patch&pathrev=4265> >> >> and apply it manually and reply if it works. >> >> regards, >> Anca Vamanu >> >> >> Sigrid Thijs wrote: >>> Anca Vamanu wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> I know it is useless but this is what the RFC says: a successful >>>> Subscribe must be followed by a Notify with the presence >>>> state(none in this case). >>>> >>> But in this case, no SUBSCRIBE is sent by the watcher. The >>> presentity changes his presence (which issues a PUBLISH), and the >>> presence module sends notifications on all active watcher dialogs. >>> Also those that are 'polite-block'-ed (who receive always a NOTIFY >>> with the same content). I'm not saying it's wrong, it's just one >>> thing we noticed. >>> >>> kind regards, >>> >>> Sigrid >>> >>>> regards, >>>> Anca >>>> >>>> >>>> Sigrid Thijs wrote: >>>>> Just a remark: one more thing we noticed is that when a >>>>> presentity has 'polite-block'ed a watcher, the presence module >>>>> sends a NOTIFY to the watcher each time the presentity changes >>>>> his presence, although the content of the NOTIFY stays the same >>>>> (no body). >>>>> >>>>> kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> Sigrid >>>>> >>>>> Sigrid Thijs wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> we've installed version 1.3.2 and it works now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sigrid >>>>>> >>>>>> Anca Vamanu wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have fixed it now. Please update, test and reply if it works. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>> Anca Vamanu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sigrid Thijs wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sigrid Thijs wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But now we noticed another problem. When the subscription >>>>>>>>> handling is set to "polite-block", a NOTIFY should be sent >>>>>>>>> containing a presence document that indicates that the >>>>>>>>> presentity is unavailable. But the presence module sends a >>>>>>>>> NOTIFY containing a presence description with the current >>>>>>>>> presence state of the presentity. So there's no difference >>>>>>>>> between setting the subscription handling to "allow" and >>>>>>>>> "polite-block". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> did you get any chance to take a look at this issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> kind regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sigrid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> kind regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sigrid >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As a note, unless you are using more that one presence >>>>>>>>>> servers, the fallback to db mode is not really needed and >>>>>>>>>> inefficient. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, >>>>>>>>>> Anca Vamanu >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sigrid Thijs wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> we've configured OpenSER 1.3.0 on a FreeBSD server, >>>>>>>>>>> together with OpenXCAP 0.9.9. >>>>>>>>>>> When testing presence rules (RFC 5025) with our UA, we >>>>>>>>>>> noticed the following behavior: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Subscription Handling is set to "block" in the presence >>>>>>>>>>> rules: >>>>>>>>>>> When a watcher subscribes for presence, it receives a >>>>>>>>>>> NOTIFY with the Subscription-State set to >>>>>>>>>>> "terminated;reason=rejected". This is as expected. >>>>>>>>>>> When the presentity changes it's presence, the watcher >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't receive any NOTIFY requests with the presence >>>>>>>>>>> update (also OK). >>>>>>>>>>> But, when the presentity changes the subscription handling >>>>>>>>>>> to "allow" in the presence-rules document, the server sends >>>>>>>>>>> an in-dialog NOTIFY request on the subscription dialog that >>>>>>>>>>> was previously terminated. This is not ok. See the attached >>>>>>>>>>> file presence_rules_01.txt. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Subscription Handling is set to "allow" in the presence >>>>>>>>>>> rules: >>>>>>>>>>> When the presentity changes the subscription handling to >>>>>>>>>>> "block" in the presence-rules document, the server sends a >>>>>>>>>>> NOTIFY with the Subscription-State set to >>>>>>>>>>> "terminated;reason=timeout" to the watchers. >>>>>>>>>>> When the presentity changes his presence, the presence >>>>>>>>>>> server will still send NOTIFY requests to the watchers. >>>>>>>>>>> See the attached file presence_rules_02.txt. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> kind regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sigrid >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Users(a)lists.openser.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>>> Users(a)lists.openser.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>> Users(a)lists.openser.org >>>>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)lists.openser.org > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >