16 Sep
2021
16 Sep
'21
10:22 a.m.
Hello,
the commit you references has nothing to do with version 5.2.5 -- it was
a revert of commits done during 5.5.x development.
So the issue should be somewhere else, unless it was a mistake in typing
the version and instead of 5.2.5 was supposed to be 5.5.2.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16.09.21 09:13, Sergey Safarov wrote:
you need to make sure you used the latest commits in
branch 5.5 or
used master.
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2843
<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2843>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:22 AM Zé Santos <individuoestima(a)gmail.com
<mailto:individuoestima@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi guys, I am currently using kamailio v5.2.5 and running it
inside a container. I already attempted to upgrade the kamailio to
the latest version however the problem persists.
This is the core dump that I got from using gdb:
Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -f
/etc/kazoo/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -x tlsf -w'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x000000000071c63c in select_cfg_var (res=0x7ffd57d49b10,
s=0x7f2649395040, msg=0x7ffd57d4c340) at core/cfg/cfg_select.c:211
211 i = *(int *)p;
It seems that the problem is with this line:
modparam("dmq", "notification_address",
"sip:DMQ_NOTIFY_ADDRESS")
Also, I only have this issue while running on an AWS instance, I
have the same setup on my local computer, however kamailio is able
to start correctly.
While kamailio is starting, I have this line
#!substdef "!DMQ_NOTIFY_ADDRESS!10.10.10.10:5090!g"
It seems that after DMQ is able to obtain the IP address, when it
comes to actually sending the message, it is interpreting the ip
address of the DMQ_NOTIFY_ADDRESS as an integer and then it gives
out a segmentation fault and the module stops.
Another interesting thing is that if the DMQ_NOTIFY_ADDRESS is the
MY_IP_ADDRESS variable instead of the 10.10.10.10, it seems to
work properly.
#!substdef "!DMQ_NOTIFY_ADDRESS!MY_IP_ADDRESS:5090!g"
It also doesn't seem related to the ip being in a variable, since
I already tried using a DNS record, and once again, it is able to
obtain the IPs from the DNS record, and the same issue applies.
Has anyone ever seen anything like this? I can't find any evidence
of this actually happening.
Thank you kindly for your time.
Best Regards,
José Santos
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply
only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda