FYI, exec_msg is highly not recommended because it is
"expensive" in
terms of processing.
Regards,
Paul
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:37:58 +0100, Jffdsaklj dsjk <jjjaime(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Finally I found a solution. I've attached the
block I included in the
SER cfg file.
The problem (big problem) is that after a day (more or less), there
are defunct processes. I think it's a problem of the exec_msg
sentence, but I'm not sure. With these defunct processes, SER crashed.
:(
######################################################################
# This block of code controls the user registration
if (method=="REGISTER") {
# Enable authentication
if (!www_authorize("galeno.hi.inet","subscriber")) {
www_challenge("galeno.hi.inet","0");
break;
};
####
# This block prevents a user from registering with a login
previously registered from another machine
#
# Verify it's not a deregistration message
if (!search("Expires: 0")) {
# It's a registration message
# Verify that there's no register in the table location with the
same user but from a differente machine
if (
!exec_msg('
USUARIO=`echo $SIP_HF_FROM | sed -n
"s/<sip:\(.*\)@.*/\1/p"`;
QUERY="select username from location where
username=\"$USUARIO\" and contact not like
\"sip:$SIP_SRCIP:%\"";
RESULT=`mysql -uXXX -pXXX -e "$QUERY" ser`;
if [ -z "$RESULT" ]; then exit 0; else echo "The user
$USUARIO is already registered" >> /var/log/serprueba.log; exit 1;
fi;')
) {
# The user is already registered
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
}
####
save("location");
break;
};
#####################################################################
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:11:01 +0100, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Hi Jffdsaklj! (must be a hard life living with
such a name)
And how will you distinguish between an invalid registration and a valid
re-registration from a new IP address?
regards,
klaus
Jffdsaklj dsjk wrote:
How can we restrict the registration to only one
user per login?.
Currently, you can register with the same login/password in different
machines at the same time. But what we require is that only the first
registration is valid and the rest ones are invalidated by the SER.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers