8 Oct
2013
8 Oct
'13
2:50 p.m.
Am 08.10.2013 12:14, schrieb Grant Bagdasarian:
Hello,
I've setup two Kamailio machines, one which does all the processing
and the second one which always replies with a 500 Server Internal
Error, to test my Dispatcher fail-over.
When routing a call, the call is always routed to the second Kamailio
first, to test the fail-over.
What happens in this scenario is the 500 is received by the main
Kamailio and the 500 message is duplicated to the capture server.
After this the failure_route kicks in and the 500 is obviously never
sent back to the initiator.
The changes made to the 500 message (adding a new header), in
onreply_route, aren't present when the message is duplicated to the
capture server, because the original 500 message is duplicated instead
of the modified one.
Out of curiosity -why do you add a header to the response if it is
likely to be dropped (depending of the response in the second branch)?
Just to signal data to the capture server?
klaus