20 Nov
2012
20 Nov
'12
9:45 p.m.
Hello,
On 11/20/12 7:34 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
Hi,
can you be a litle more specific of the steps of the install and where
do i make the changes?
in the source tree, edit the file Makefile.defs and set:
MEMDBG=1
then run:
make all
make install
some words of what is the diff between f_malloc and
q_malloc will be
great :-).
q_malloc is more debugging purposes, keeping more information for each
chunk, therefore the overhead is a bit higher than with f_malloc, but
because keeps more details, it is faster to find the fragments that can
be joined.
Cheers,
Daniel
thanks,
Uri
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
ok, I will look over it. At this moment the f_malloc (which is
enabled for 3.3) has a pretty inefficient mem join implementation,
can you try with q_malloc? Edit Makefile.defs and set:
MEMDBG=1
Then compile and install.
The join operation should be faster, let's see if you get blocking
issues with this one.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/20/12 2:57 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Daniel hi,
I attached 2 txt files.
One with mem_join=1, the other with mem_join=0, and the info you
asked for.
Let me know if it is OK.
Thanks,
Uri
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
if you set memjoin to 0, do you see any difference?
Can you try again (with memjoin 1 as well as 0) and send the
output of:
kamctl mi get_statistics shmem:
before executing the reload commands?
When it gets to 100%, can you see which process is using the
cpu and attach to it with:
gdb /path/to/kamailio PID
then do:
bt full
and send output here?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/18/12 4:09 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
After some testing I notice the
following:
First reload of 5 million records after kamailio started
took about 9 sec.
Second reload (4 minutes after the first one) took 60 sec.
The third one (again about 4 minutes after the secind) got
kamailio to use 100% cpu and after 13 minutes! i killed it.....
I can understand that the memory manger works harder, still,
any ideas on how to use mem_join and keep on reloading data.
(in real life our data loads 5 million records once a day
when almost no traffic. still after a few days it stops...)
Thanks,
Uri
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Uri Shacked
<ushacked(a)gmail.com <mailto:ushacked@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I am using MTREE and DIALPLAN modules to load lots of
info to kamailio. (6 million rows).
When kamailio was running with 3.2.1 (no mem_join=1
option), the used size was increasing but the process of
loading the data was fast eanough.
I upgraded to 3.3.2 and set mem_join=1. Now the loading
process take about 10 time longer and sometimes stops
kamailio from responding to traffic.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Uri
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda