24 Jul
2005
24 Jul
'05
12:22 a.m.
On 20-07-2005 09:35, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Omer,
I'm not aware of anybody using mangler?! (Is this really true?)
Yes, that module is somehow outdated and has been mostly replaced by
nathelper.
Jan.
The simplest solution (see my earlier post today on
STUN) would be to use
STUN if the endpoints have an ok implementation.
If not, you can use nathelper to change Contact (fix_nated_contact) and
fix_nated_sdp to change the media IP. You will still have a problem with
finding the RTP port, so unless one endpoint is public or support
direction=active, you need to proxy the rtp stream.
Or if you have symmetric NATs, you need to use RTP proxy anyway because
incoming calls to symmetric NATs must be proxied regardless of whether the
other endpoint is public or NATed (unless it supports direction=active).
g-)
Omer Tapankul wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working for a nat traversal scenerio.
The case is both endpoints are behind NAT (ADSL clients) and SER is
on the real network. In this project I dont want to implement a rtp
proxy because I have limited bandwidth on real network. I want
clients to pass signaling to me and rtp directly between eachother.
I have tried some configurations with module mangler but i could not
manage to create rtp session properly.
What do you think about the solution and if you can mail a sample
configuration I will be very happy.
Regards,
Omer
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers