[SR-Users] Moving from haproxy to db_cluster

Hi,

I have a question about the db_cluster module. We are currently using a galera mysql cluster from severalnines, in this setup haproxy is installed on the kamailio nodes handling the database failover.

The question is if a database node fails and the TCP connection breaks the sql query will probably fail when using haproxy since it is not aware of the query. Will the db_cluster module send the query to the next available mysql node in the cluster without a failing query? If thats the case i should not notice the failing dbnode in my kamailio script.

In other words, will there be a advantage in using the db_cluster module instead of haproxy?

Thanks,

Jan Hazenberg