17 Oct
2008
17 Oct
'08
6:52 p.m.
Alex Balashov schrieb:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Better? hard to say
But at least more elegant and standard conform
klaus
I guess as long as all the clients are
loose_routers (final target in
the RURI) it will work even without loose_route, if you only have 1
proxy between the clients.
Of course the forwarded in-dialgo requests will still have an Route
header which is actually not RFC conform but ignored by allmost all
SIP clients.
So, you're saying it's better to run loose_route() to have it consume
this extraneous Route: header?