Re: [Serusers] nathelper/rtpproxy when both SIP UA are behind same NAT

Hello Rafael, This is an issue I'm having at the moment as well, where two UA's are behind the same nat. SIP obviously works fine, I can ring one UA from the other (one UA a Grandstream Budgetone 100 and the other the X-Lite softphone from Counterpath). Audio doesn't work. Did you get this working with forcing rtpproxy? On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 09:44 -0500, Rafael R. GV wrote: >Hi >I need to let the UAs speak directly to each other without force >rtpproxy, Is there any solution for this issue? > >rafael > > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >From: Rafael J. Risco G.V. <rafael.risco(a)gmail.com> >Date: Apr 22, 2005 2:17 PM >Subject: UA´s behind same NAT using na thelper/rtpproxy, No Audio... >To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >I am using avpops to enable SER to see if the UAs are located behind >the same address and now I need to let the UAs speak directly to each >other (without force rtpproxy), please someone see my configuration >below and send some advice. > >rafael > >----. > if (!lookup("location")) { > log(1,"unable to locate user \n"); > # handle user which was not found > route(4); > break; > }; > > ### Test if UAS are in the same NAT: > # get the host part of the final uri (IP part) > # and store it in AVP ID 13 > > avp_write("$ruri/domain", "i:13"); > if (avp_check("i:13","eq/$src_ip/i")) { > log(1, "source IP is the same as destination IP >\n"); > route(3); > break; > }; > avp_delete("i:13/g"); >. >. ># -------------- Same NAT Call Routing (no force rtpproxy) ---- > >route[3]{ > log(1," route[3]: UAs are in the same nat, NO force_rtp_proxy >"); > >### Do something!!!! > > if(!t_relay()){ > sl_reply_error(); > }; >} >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >