Hi Nathan,
you are right about the ip_addr code that it add only ws for both ws and wss transport.
Cheers,
Henning
-----Original Message-----
From: nathan.bruning(a)talksome.com <nathan.bruning(a)talksome.com>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 12:24 PM
To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: transport=ws causing kamailio to use wrong listen socket
Thanks for all the pointers.
@Henning, it seems kamailio will always use 'transport=ws' because the RFC for SIP
URI's does not allow for wss (see:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/core/ip_addr.c#L690)
@Olle We also re-use the existing client sockets, no need for outbound connections.
Actually, my initial problem description wasn't completely correct. Our Kamailio
*does* correctly forward the SIP messages to the client, which receives them well. The
problem lies in the `Record-Route` header that Kamailio adds. In that header, Kamailio
inserts the wrong ip/port combination, as it's using a tcp socket where it should use
the tls socket.
I think the underlying problem is here:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/core/forward.c#L293. This method will
receive `proto = PROTO_WS` as described by the transport in the sip uri, but doesn't
know it's really a wss connection.
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to
sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: