23 Jun
2009
23 Jun
'09
11:52 a.m.
Konstantin Cherkasov wrote:
Hello, Alex!
Why not just provide an HTTP/REST interface to the database, then?
Perhaps I am missing something about what you are trying to accomplish,
but it is not entirely clear to me why it is necessary to have an
HTTP/REST layer that specifically utilises the database API in the exact
manner it itself is in turn utilised by those modules, as opposed to
some other manner.
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Wouldn't it be simpler to write your own
middleware daemon / service
that plumbs the manager interface (FIFO or UDP datagram) to a REST
service exposure in an embedded or peripheral HTTP server, instead of
hooking this straight into the Kamailio core?
It would provide access to database (internal database API) not management API.
I want alias_db, auth_db, domain, group, usrloc etc. to work directly with HTTP/REST
layer.