Hi, I'm not so sure...
Both are REFER based, but the signaling in the draft is:
Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
and the signaling implemented with serweb is: Proxy --INVITE--> A Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
I prefer the "REFER in session" serweb implementation, but I think the draft solution is different.
Best regards,
G.
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Jan Janak jan@iptel.org Fecha: Domingo, Abril 4, 2004 9:00 pm Asunto: Re: [Serusers] click to dial
serweb implements exactly that (REFER based) scenario.
Jan.
On 01-04 17:40, Gustavo Garcia Bernardo wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing click to dial service in serweb, and I there are some differences with draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-06, are there intentioned changes?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-
examples-06.t
xt
I think the draft solution is simpler to implement in terminals and application servers.
G.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers