5 Apr
2004
5 Apr
'04
10:56 a.m.
Hi, I'm not so sure...
Both are REFER based, but the signaling in the draft is:
Proxy --REFER--> A
A --INVITE--> B
and the signaling implemented with serweb is:
Proxy --INVITE--> A
Proxy --REFER--> A
A --INVITE--> B
I prefer the "REFER in session" serweb implementation, but I think the draft
solution is different.
Best regards,
G.
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>
Fecha: Domingo, Abril 4, 2004 9:00 pm
Asunto: Re: [Serusers] click to dial
serweb implements exactly that (REFER based)
scenario.
Jan.
On 01-04 17:40, Gustavo Garcia Bernardo wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing click to dial service in serweb, and I there are some
differences with draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-06, are there
intentioned changes?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-
examples-06.t
xt
I think the draft solution is simpler to implement in terminals and
application servers.
G.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers