28 Mar
2011
28 Mar
'11
12:34 p.m.
28 mar 2011 kl. 11.29 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
2011/3/28 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Inaki. Do google before stating things like
this ;-)
THe XMPP people have written drafts about SIP XMPP interoperability but have gotten almost
no response from the SIP crowds...
http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-core-01.html
http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-groupchat-01.html
http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-media-01.html
Now, check the SIP forum. How many times do they mention XMPP?
/O
the proposal is to implement a signaling gateway
between SIP and JINGLE to
enable voice calls between the two networks
Let me a question: Why SIP people is interested in interoperate with
XMPP while the opposite is not true? We have also tried to build IM/presence gateways
between SIP and XMPP
(well, as SIMPLE just sucks it's arguable).
But, have XMPP people tryed to "integrate" SIP into XMPP? not at all,
they have developed their own spec for adding voice/video over XMPP. I
don't think they are interested in SIP at all.
As a teacher in my high school told me, protocol A cannot be
compatible with protocol B. If they are compatible, then they are the
*same* protocol. So "interoperability" between different protocols
just mean that a single protocol will remain alive. Which one?
Just wondering.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
---
* Olle E Johansson - oej(a)edvina.net
* Cell phone +46 70 593 68 51, Office +46 8 96 40 20, Sweden