22 Oct
2012
22 Oct
'12
8:04 p.m.
Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it
regards
klaus
On 17.10.2012 20:18, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes:
is the setup without the 1/2 flags like this:
uac invite -> proxy -> invite -> proxy -> invite -> first uas
-> cancel -> proxy -> cancel -> first uas
-> invite -> second uas
where second proxy instance calls unforce_rtpproxy when it receives the
cancel, thus tearing down also the rtpproxy session for the second leg?
is so, why would second proxy instance be involved with rtpproxy stuff
at all because that has been already taken care of by the first
instance?
or is it so that first proxy instance didn't arm rtpproxy, but second
instance did and then first instance armed rtpproxy for second uas
before second instance unarmed it due to cancel?
-- juha