23 Apr
2007
23 Apr
'07
6:25 a.m.
At 09:12 23/04/2007, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Klaus Darilion writes:
I guess that some practical aspects were out of scope of this paper -- it does
not seem to seek to provide a full solution. I was merely referring to the
DB part of it.
-jiri
> it would be interesting to read that paper,
but i guess it is not freely
> available. so far i have not seen any solution that would do two
> the things at the same time: balance load and be resilient.
thanks klaus for the pointer.
i briefly looked at the proposed solution in figure 12 and didn't find
anything about nat keepalive pinging. which of the proxies does that or
does the solution assume that UAs are not behind nats