10 Jan
2007
10 Jan
'07
2:54 a.m.
Jose,
Could you please send this to serdev?
AFAIK, fragmenting should go transparent, but mobile ip might interfere
in some way here. Have you tried the same scenario without mipv6?
g-)
Jose Angel Calvo wrote:
Thank you for your help and sorry for my English.
I have a problem with mipv6 and a server SIP, SER (SIP Express Router).
The mipv6 path is "mipv6-2.0.2" from http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/
,in kernel 2.6.16.24-Ubuntu.
The problem occurs when a packet is too big (it must be fragmented),
and go to the node what makes function of P-CSCF (Proxy in SIP) and
Correspondent Node.
If the P-CSCF is not a CN, all is OK. But if the node is CN, then i
have the problem. The SER logs are:
##############################################################
................
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]: SER: new INVITE Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]: parse_headers: flags=-1 Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]:
check_via_address(2001:720:1500:1B:FCFD:FF:FE0C:103,
[2001:720:1500:1B:FCFD:FF:FE0C:103], 3) Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8051]: ERROR: warning_builder: buffer size exceeded Nov
20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]: WARNING: warning skipped --
too big Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]:
WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8051]: DEBUG: reply sent out.
buf=0x8106270: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0xb5e8b330: SIP/2.0 1 Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]: DEBUG: _reply_light: finished Nov
20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS
lookup... Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8051]:
check_via_address(2001:720:1500:1B:FCFD:FF:FE0C:103,
[2001:720:1500:1B:FCFD:FF:FE0C:103], 3) Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8068]: DBG: tcp_main_loop: dead child 2 (shutting down?)
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8049]: child process 8051 exited
by a signal 11 Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD kernel: [4296472.851000]
<0>skb_under_panic: text:c02d2aad len:321 put:14 head:d62cfc00
data:d62cfbea tail:d62cfd2b end:d62cfd80 dev:eth0
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8049]: core was not generated Nov
20 18:28:25 pcscfD kernel: [4297162.639000] ------------[ cut here
]------------
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8049]: INFO: terminating due to
SIGCHLD Nov 20 18:28:25
pcscfD kernel: [4297162.639000] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:112!
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8059]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8052]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8053]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8054]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8055]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8056]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8057]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8058]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8060]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8061]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8062]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8063]: INFO: signal 15 received
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8064]: INFO: signal 15 received Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8065]: INFO: signal 15 received Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8066]: INFO: signal 15 received Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8067]: INFO: signal 15 received Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8068]: INFO: signal 15 received Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8050]: INFO: signal 15 received Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
kernel: [4297162.639000] invalid opcode: 0000 [#3]
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8059]: Memory status (pkg): Nov
20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8052]: Memory status (pkg): Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8053]: Memory status (pkg): Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8054]: Memory status (pkg): Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8055]: Memory status (pkg): Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8056]: Memory status (pkg):
.......................
Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8049]: hash =
2055 fragments no.: 1, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 1048576
- 2097152 (first 1572864) Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8049]: hash = 2059 fragments no.: 1, unused: 0
^I^I bucket size: 16777216 - 33554432 (first 31934160) Nov 20
18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8049]: TOTAL: 26 free fragments =
33537656 free bytes Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8049]:
----------------------------- Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8049]: shm_mem_destroy Nov 20 18:28:25 pcscfD
/usr/sbin/ser[8049]: destroying the shared memory lock Nov 20 18:28:25
pcscfD /usr/sbin/ser[8049]: terminating due to SIGCHLD
##############################################################
The problem is in the MTU size, because if the packet is not
fragmented, there is not a problem. But the INVITE packet
needs to fragment, what it means, i always have the same problem.
My SER version is version: ser 0.9.6 (i386/linux) and it's a vanilla
version. The packets is sent over UDP.
My questions are:
- Have anybody the same o similar problem?
- The MTU size is a problem in SER?
- Have anybody sent fragmented packets with SER?
Thanks for your help.
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers