Re: [Serusers] Fwd: record_route..........TCP ??

On 5/3/07, Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote: > I think you would have to send message dumps first so that [serusers] volunteers > have material for providing an answer. > > -jiri > > At 12:07 03/05/2007, KUMAR wrote: >> - >> Hi all, >> I already posted this message yet havent got any replies. I really >> need to find this out. >> Please anyone reply to this problem. >> >> I am using SER-0.9.6 and the problem i'm having is this. When using >> the following ser.cfg, it works well when the transport UDP is used. >> But when transport TCP is used, then it only results in one way IM, >> only from the UA from which the INVITE is being sent. Moreover, when >> record_route is used instead of record_route_preset, then even that >> one way IM doesn't work. But it works well with UDP. >> >> Can anyone please point me as to where the problem might be?? >> Thank you in advance. >> >> kumar >> >> >> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=ser.cfg >> X-Attachment-Id: f_f18sg2bl >> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ser.cfg" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > -- > Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ > >