Hi,

Michal Matyska pisze:
Hi Tomasz,

its strange, I'll check when I get some time for it.
Do you use 2.0.rcX or HEAD?

  
I use head, I get similar errors when I try to use selects like @ruri.name.
Anyway, you can temporarilly use @hf_value from textops for the same
purpose...

  
Ill try this:)
Expressions are evalueated form left to right, so 
if (A && B) - if A is false, B is not evaluated at all...
  
Thank you
Cheers
Tomasz
Michal

On Po, 2007-06-18 at 09:20 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
  
Hi,

Michal when I check the condition for Allow header I get the following:
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: Unable to resolve select 'Allow' at level 2
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: BUG: route.c:358: Unable to resolve select

Cheers
Tomasz

    
On Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart wrote:
      
Hi Tomasz,

        
if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain")  ?
          
something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-)
        
Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")

      
There would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers
and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
the offline messages are not dumped to the UA. 
          
You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
        
if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more elegant way

Michal