I use head, I get similar errors when I try to use selects like @ruri.name.Hi Tomasz, its strange, I'll check when I get some time for it. Do you use 2.0.rcX or HEAD?
Ill try this:)Anyway, you can temporarilly use @hf_value from textops for the same purpose...
Thank youExpressions are evalueated form left to right, so if (A && B) - if A is false, B is not evaluated at all...
Michal On Po, 2007-06-18 at 09:20 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:Hi, Michal when I check the condition for Allow header I get the following: Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: Unable to resolve select 'Allow' at level 2 Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: BUG: route.c:358: Unable to resolve select Cheers TomaszOn Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart wrote:Hi Tomasz,if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-)Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")There would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more elegant way Michal