14 Jan
2005
14 Jan
'05
12:38 p.m.
Now it's ok...
Thanx
Verbal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
To: "Richard" <richard(a)o-matrix.org>
Cc: "'Francesco Bottà'" <francesco.botta(a)eutelia.it>it>;
<Daniel-Constantin.Mierla(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>de>; <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] RPID problem in 0.9.0 release
Yes, I've noticed it already. Fix committed, please try again and let me
know if there are any problems.
-Maxim
Richard wrote:
Try this patch,
cvs server: Diffing .
Index: rpid.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/ser/sip_router/modules/auth/rpid.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 rpid.c
--- rpid.c 13 Jan 2005 09:12:19 -0000 1.9
+++ rpid.c 14 Jan 2005 07:58:26 -0000
@@ -247,7 +247,6 @@
*/
void save_rpid(str* _rpid)
{
- rpid.s = 0;
rpid.len = rpid_is_e164 = 0;
if (!_rpid) {
cvs server: Diffing doc
system.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 11:58 AM
To: Francesco Bottà
Cc: Richard; Daniel-Constantin.Mierla(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de;
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] RPID problem in 0.9.0 release
It's off no use without original binary/libraries. Instead of sending it
over do the following when the crash happens:
gdb /path/to/ser /path/to/core
In the gdb type command `bt' (w/o quotes) and send me its output.
-Maxim
Francesco Bottà wrote:
childrens:
In attach the coredump...
Regards,
Verbal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
To: "Francesco Bottà" <francesco.botta(a)eutelia.it>
Cc: "Richard" <richard(a)o-matrix.org>rg>; <Daniel-
Constantin.Mierla(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>gt;; <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] RPID problem in 0.9.0 release
Francesco Bottà wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I don't know if this is related to this change in the code (or other
last commit) but now the release 0.9.0 get terminated due to SIGCHLD:
>
>Hmm, the problem isn't SIGCHLD, but SIGSEGV received by one of child
process 11345 exited by a signal 11
Can you please get a corefile and post a backtrace or enable more
verbose debugging mode so that we can see what operation SER tries to
make when this SIGSEGV happens?
-Maxim
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp /usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: Maxfwd module-
initializing
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: permissions -
initializing
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: Default allow file
(/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.allow) not found => empty rule set
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: Default deny file
(/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.deny) parsed
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: PIKE - initializing
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp /usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]:
INFO:pike:init_lock_set: probing 256 set size
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: AVPops - initializing
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp /usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: INFO: udp_init:
SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: INFO: udp_init:
SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11343]: INFO: fifo process
starting: 11343
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11343]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11343]: SER: open_uac_fifo:
fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo...
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11343]: WARNING: no
fifo_db_url given - fifo DB commands disabled!
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11344]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11345]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11346]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:40 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11348]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:41 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11347]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:41 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11349]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:41 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11350]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:41 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11352]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:41 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11354]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:41 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11351]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:06:41 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy
found, support for it enabled
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: child process 11345
exited by a signal 11
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: core was generated
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp /usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: INFO: terminating due
to SIGCHLD
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11348]: INFO: signal 15
received
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11343]: INFO: signal 15
received
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11349]: INFO: signal 15
received
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11350]: INFO: signal 15
received
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11351]: INFO: signal 15
received
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11352]: INFO: signal 15
received
>Jan 13 16:07:12 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11354]: INFO: signal 15
received
>Jan 13 16:07:15 spsexp
/usr/local/sbin/ser[11333]: PIKE - destroying
module
>How can I get more information to find the
cause of this SIGCHLD???
>
>Many thanx,
>
>Verbal
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
>To: "Richard" <richard(a)o-matrix.org>
>Cc: <Daniel-Constantin.Mierla(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>de>; "'Francesco
Bottà'"
<francesco.botta(a)eutelia.it>it>; <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
>Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:15 AM
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] RPID problem in 0.9.0 release
>
>
>The fix is incorrect since it creates memory leak. I've just committed a
>proper fix. Please test and let me know if you are still experiencing
>this problem.
>
>-Maxim
>
>Richard wrote:
>
>
>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]
On
>>>Behalf Of
Daniel-Constantin.Mierla(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de
>>>Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:01 AM
>>>To: Francesco Bottà
>>>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org; Maxim Sobolev
>>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] RPID problem in 0.9.0 release
>>>
>>>auth_db is one of the module which wasn't reviewed yet - reason to
have a
>>>prelease (or testing release) by now.
As far as I understood, with
these
>>>two
>>>new parameters you load the values of the appropriate columns from
>>>database in
>>>AVP list, while append_rpid_hf() uses a static buffer which is filled
when
>>>use_rpid=1. So you have to keep the
value to 1 for now.
>>
>>
>>It appears to be a bug in the auth_db module. It saves rpid in the
static
>>buffer as well as the avp rpid. The
problem is the static buffer refers
to a
>>local variable which probably no longer
exists when append_rpid_hf() is
>>called.
>>
>>Apply the attached patch should solve the problem.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Otherwise, you can push a value from AVP list to a header using avpops
>>>module.
>>>
>>
>>The current avp functions can't manipulate the avp. So prefix and
suffix
>>can't be added to the header field. Of
course one can change the data
in the
>>>database, but it will not be backward compatible to the existing >>>Richard
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>