20 May
2020
20 May
'20
9:06 p.m.
Hi Georg,
setid is not an autoincrement.
See the DB structure information (should be to your version)
https://kamailio.org/docs/db-tables/kamailio-db-5.1.x.html#idm1963
I group my targets with the setid. That's maybe the name "sets of id's"
So all with the same id would be taken if the are active and how you call
them from your kamailio.cfg.
The other question is an implementation one. I don't understand the problem
completely.
Cheers
Karsten
George Diamantopoulos <georgediam(a)gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 20. Mai 2020,
19:42:
Hello all,
I need to have two separate kamailio instances' dispatcher modules make
the same decisions when using algorithm 7 (hash over pvar). What do I need
to do to ensure this?
Note that for design reasons, the two instances cannot share a dispatcher
table from db. If I ensure the "setid" group used for algo 7 in the
respective cases contain the same group of hosts, is it enough? Do other
things matter, such as the ordering of the group members in the table (i.e.
different AUTO INCREMENT ids?). Does the setid need to be the same number?
Do I need to ensure the 'destination' values are identical (i.e. not using
IPs for dispatcher table A and hostnames for dispatcher table B)?
If someone knows what the criteria is for matching a hashed pvar to a
member of a dispatcher setid and how this can be made deterministic, I
would be grateful. Thanks!
BR,
George
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users