4 Dec
2020
4 Dec
'20
7:31 p.m.
If that's the case then I don't know why this line doesn't show the ipv6
address of the client:
Dec 3 18:05:47 ashmainrtpe42 rtpengine[8505]: DEBUG:
[ep1sbnkk9tikhg4kpmot]: Forward to sink endpoint:
2001:8a0:78fc:7000:e1d7:e93:3c50:ee71:59827 (RTP seq 25423 TS 0)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:25 AM Richard Fuchs <rfuchs(a)sipwise.com> wrote:
On 04/12/2020 10.39, Andrew Chen wrote:
--
Andy Chen
Sr. Telephony Lead Engineer
415 516 5535 (M)
achen@ <achen(a)thinkingphones.com>fuze.com
--
*Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any
attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or
any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the
contents to any other person. Thank you.*
So my next question would be:
My 200 OK back to the client should have rtpengine as the only ICE
candidate. Shouldn't it use that one instead?
Yes it should. And it probably does.
Cheers
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users