1 Dec
2015
1 Dec
'15
1:50 p.m.
Hello,
thanks for the patch, can you make a pull request on github -- it is
easier to review and merge. Don't forget to format the commit message as
per guidelines from the wiki.
- https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/devel/github-contributions
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/12/15 11:37, Kristian F. Høgh wrote:
Hi,
I hope the correct solution to the problem is to add RR parameters on
sequential requests.
The attached patch restores vsf=, vst= and did=.
Dragons ahead, so far it works for me.
Regards,
Kristian Høgh
Uni-tel A/S
On Friday 27 November 2015 14:07:08 Kristian F. Høgh wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
http://miconda.eu
Hi again,
I looked at the wrong request, when I wrote it
was a patch we
applied in-house.
(I looked at Route: header received from UA, not
RR send by kamailio.)
RR on sequential requests have no did/vsf, using
vanilla kamailio
version 4.2.5 as written below.
If required I can test later using master. (I
tested ealier, but it
included our patches, which doesn't make any difference
on 4.2.5)
The questions still remain.
Should kamailio add did/vsf on sequential
requests, when I call
record_route()?
Should I set dlg_match_mode to 1? (I use 0)
Is it wrong to call record_route() from
sequential requests?
Regards,
Kristian.
On Friday 27 November 2015 12:54:50 Kristian F.
Høgh wrote:
Hi list,
Record-route on sequential requests doesn't
have did/vsf parm.
On initial INVITE, I call record_route() and set
dialog flag.
kamailio adds the following RR
Record-Route:
<sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2>
UAC sends a re-INVITE, containing the following
route:
Route:
<sip:178.21.251.54;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2>
I call loose_route() followed by record-route(),
and kamailio adds
the following RR:
Record-Route:
<sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df>
I've got a phone which updates the routeset
on sequential requests
(which I don't think it should) and the did-matching
fails.
Should kamailio add did/vsf on sequential
requests, when I call
record_route()?
Should I set dlg_match_mode to 1? (I use 0)
Is it wrong to call record_route() from
sequential requests?
Which way is the best to resolve the problem?
Regards,
Kristian Høgh
Uni-tel A/S
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users