----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:13
PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Strange
response
Westell DSL routers also change the source
port. Thats why you need to forward port 5060 on the NAT device to the
ATA.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:25
PM
Subject: [Serusers] Strange
response
Hi,
I have tested cisco ATA186 (private IP) with
SER under different circumstances. With Linksys and D-link router, there
were no problem. But with Lioncom ADSL router, a strange thing happened. In
this case, the ATA is having a private IP 192.168.5.2 and the SIP port
number is the default 5060. The public IP of the ADSL connection
was 195.226.252.124. The following is the traces from ngrep. As you can see,
the Lioncom router forwarded (NAT) the SIP REGISTER with port 30150 while
SER sent the response back to port 5060. So the ATA couldn't receive the
response at all. What maybe the problem?
#
U 195.226.252.124:30150 ->
192.168.3.29:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.abc.com SIP/2.0..Via:
SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.5.2:5060..From: <sip:6701892@si
p.abc.com;user=phone>..To:
<sip:6701892@sip.abc.com;user=phone>..Call-ID: 1781909739@1
92.168.5.2..CSeq: 1
REGISTER..Contact: *..Expires: 0..User-Agent: Cisco ATA v2.15 ata18x
(0209
27a)..Content-Length: 0....
#
U 192.168.3.29:5060
-> 195.226.252.124:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized..Via:
SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.5.2:5060;received=195.226.252.124..From:
<s
ip:6701892@sip.abc.com;user=phone>..To:
<sip:6701892@sip.abc.com;user=phone>;tag=d907c
037823644515dfe0ede38ca9976.9b53..Call-ID: 1781909739@192.168.5.2..CSeq:
1 REGISTER..WWW-Authen
ticate: Digest realm="sip.abc.com",
nonce="3e89f40b00000000e3fd8eedb58e5662ca62981749bb0006
",
algorithm=MD5..Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10
(i386/linux))..Content-Length: 0..Warning:
392
192.168.3.29:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=10613
req_src_ip=195.226.252.124 in_uri=sip:s
ip.bmx-inc.com
out_uri=sip:sip.abc.com via_cnt==1"....
Thanks,
Bo