On 07/22/05 20:54, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2005 01:06 pm, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
I've asked this question in serusers and serdevel. Noone answered, so I thought I'd ask it here about openser. I haven't tried openser yet, it's on my todo list. I saw that openser implemented connection pool for mysql backend. What about postgres?
The maintainer of this module has not implemented the connection pool yet. It was no activity for quite some time of postgres module,but now seems that many users started using it, so we have put it in the roadmap to review. Unfortunately I have no experience with postgres, so the priority is quite low in my list.
I see. That's a pity. BTW I can't find it in the roadmap available online.
The review explicitly mentions the migration to the memory manager used by ser.
Sorry, it wasn't clear for me that this is about connection pool implementation.
because I have no much knowledge about this module -- the stuff about the memory manager I discovered when Ingo Wolfsberger told us about a lot of warnings issued by this module. But when it is going to be reviewed, it should be aligned to latest DB API (implemented now by mysql module).
Daniel
sorry, that was a misleading info from my side, I was thinking to a wrong bitmask present in openser. You can start as many as children you want.
Thanks for the info.
Daniel