Re: [Serusers] [Serdev] loose_route behaviour, detecting single Route with myself

Klaus Darilion wrote:

Nils Ohlmeier wrote:

...

But such a seperation would mean a change in the behavior again, because currently preloaded requests are also handled by loose_route() (it returns true for these requests). So it would be only an option to change this in head.

I would vote to make totally new functions which also have a better naming. Then people can use the old function with old behavior or the new functions with new behavior.

Me 2. Possibly even put all that into a new rr module (rr2? recroute?).

Regards, Martin

PS: Why is this thread send to serdev twice? Or is there a difference between serdev@iptel.org and serdev@lists.iptel.org?