27 Feb
2014
27 Feb
'14
5:40 p.m.
Vladimir-
Transcoding can be supported in software as well.
Not at high capacity, like 20,000+ AMR-WB calls in a 1U server. My experience has been
that high volume users of SBC
products are SWaP constrained -- especially limited space and power consumption. Their
end customers do not allow a
stacks of servers for voice/video transcoding, speech recognition, etc.
-Jeff
As the maintainers of SEMS we fully agree with Carsten
and Alex: the SBC
module of SEMS is a good replacement of a typical SBC. If one also is
looking for ease of usage, support, high availability and a powerful GUI
then the answer is the ABC SBC which is based on SEMS and the SBC
module. A free trial is provided under http://www.frafos.com/free-trial/
The ABC SBC also enables easy configuration of LCR using provisioned
tables and comes in an active-strandby configuration that enables
failover without call interruption. Transcoding can be supported in
software as well.
Best Regards,
-Vladimir
On 27.2.2014 07:24, Melanie Pietersen wrote:
looking at this, is there some howto for setting
up high-availability,
LCR and route-by-route transcoding?
Melanie
On 2/20/14 7:12 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Francesco,
i would recommend, you look at the SEMS-project and it's SBC module.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users From the functionality perspective, i don't
think you'll miss anything
compared to Acme Packet, latest trunk version even
has a Registration
cache, which works absolutely great...
Kind regards,
Carsten
2014-02-20 17:04 GMT+01:00 Francesco Maria Magnini <fmm1982(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an
ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
- it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
- it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP
carriers via SIP trunks
- it is used for NAT traversal
In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC
and this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server
and the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks).
In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users