Re: [Serusers] parallel forking best practice?

Hi, I do not know that it is best, I even sure that it is not :) but it very useful and very flexible to execute external application that will return list of URI. Why it flexible - because you can do, for example, balancing of whatever you use for termination all (in my case b2bua) plus I use nagios that testing my b2buas/gws/voicemails and then my "routing" script uses this info to avoid bad destinations Plus different features like, call return, redial, call forward, step by step routing (like first call ring on your SIP device, if it fail it ring on your office phone and if it fail goes to your cell phone and same time to your gf cell phone :)) My script taking all this info from MSSQL database, of course it add some delay to your call (PDD) but that the price, you can always use few boxes with this setup in parallel (replicate) and do redundant SQL server for fast answer -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Jev Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:01 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] parallel forking best practice? Hi All, For the 0_9_0 branch, what is the 'best practice' for implementing parallel forking? We used to be able to point one alias at several accounts, but that feature has regressed. Thanks, -Jev _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers